Epic Games boss defends Twitter, calls #BlocktheBlue supporters ‘losers and goons’
Epic Games boss Tim Sweeney has weighed in on the discourse about blue checkmarks on Twitter, saying that people supporting the “Block the Blue” campaign are “losers and goons” who are trying to exclude people from “cool kid events.”
It’s fair to say that Twitter has been a goat rodeo since Elon Musk took control of the company in late 2022, but things took a turn for the even stupider last week. After months of waffling and fake-outs, Twitter finally eliminated legacy verification checks (opens in new tab), meaning that the only people with the little checkmarks on their accounts were those who were paying $8 per month for a Twitter Blue subscription.
A few of the old check-holders remained: Xbox men Phil Spencer (opens in new tab) and Larry Hryb (opens in new tab), for instance, kept their blue checks because they’re affiliated with the official Xbox (opens in new tab) account, which now has a gold check, signifying that it’s verified as “an official organization on Twitter.” For the most part, though, the “verified” blue checks were gone.
Rather than encouraging people to sign up for Twitter Blue, though, the new program had the opposite effect. Celebrities immediately and easily turned their backs on the whole thing, leading right-wing figures who had previously complained about being ‘censored’ on Twitter started complaining that the new program they’d embraced now had no value. Many seemed genuinely baffled by the notion that celebrities and other high-profile Twitter users want nothing to do with it: “Hollywood celebrities are showing exactly who they are right now – arrogant elitist snobs worth $200 million dollars who won’t pay $8 because they think they’re better than everyone else,” one said, missing the point in genuinely stunning fashion.
Out of all this chaos arose the #BlocktheBlue campaign, which is a sort of boycott aimed at improving the quality of the Twitter experience by auto-blocking Twitter Blue subscribers. The idea actually goes back to last year, when dril, one of Twitter’s best-known (and straight-up best) users, said he would “absolutely block on sight” anyone subscribed to Twitter Blue.
With any usefulness of the blue checkmark now gone, it’s now more than just a joke—you can actually get a Chrome extension (opens in new tab) that will auto-block any Twitter Blue subscriber who appears in your feed. But Sweeney, who founded Epic Games in 1991 and now has an estimated net worth of $7.6 billion, doesn’t think that’s the way to go.
“People in this #BlockTheBlue (opens in new tab) pressure campaign are losers and goons,” Sweeney tweeted over the weekend. “They’re the cool kids from junior high who worked to exclude we nerds from cool kid events, plus the losers who joined in to gain cred. The elite-only verification system sucked, been criticizing it since 2018.
“An online community like this should be a meritocracy, where everyone has an equal chance, and merit is earned rather than anointed by a corporation. Old school Twitter had found a great expression of merit with following & retweeting. The best rose to the top. Then someone well-meaningly built a system for preventing impersonation through verification. But they broke the meritocracy with a policy deeming verification only for elite ‘noteworthy’ users, while letting Twitter employees hand out verification to their friends as a perk.”
An online community like this should be a meritocracy, where everyone has an equal chance, and merit is earned rather than anointed by a corporation. Old school Twitter had found a great expression of merit with following & retweeting. The best rose to the top.April 22, 2023
Sweeney clarified that he doesn’t think the new system is much better: What he really wants to see is “proper identity verification as a service like old Twitter had, but opened up to everyone affordably like new Twitter (or free),” saying that such an option would represent “the best of both worlds.” He also said that ideally, Twitter’s verification, curation, and subscription systems would all work independently of one another.
“My criticism isn’t directed towards folks who choose not to subscribe, but advocates of boycotting every person on Twitter who isn’t boycotting Twitter,” Sweeney said. “That seems extreme.”
I’m not so sure it is. The value of blue checks was gutted by the subscription program, which lets anyone with eight bucks and a phone get one—and in turn makes sharing space with them that much less desirable a prospect. Sweeney bemoaned what he predicted will be increased political polarization as a result of the campaign, which he said aims to “bully people who signed up for democratized Twitter verification into leaving so they can feel like part of your ‘in’ group,” but I think it’s more an inverse of the famous XKCD comic (opens in new tab) on free speech: If you invite the worst sorts of people into your home, you shouldn’t be surprised when everyone else leaves.
Musk’s response to the #BlocktheBlue campaign over the weekend has not inspired confidence in his ability to chart a rational way forward: Rather than addressing legitimate criticism, he began returning blue checks to some celebrities, without their knowledge or permission, in order to dissuade people from auto-blocking blue-checked subscribers. This resulted in figures including Jamal Khashoggi (opens in new tab), Anthony Bourdain (opens in new tab), Chris Cornell (opens in new tab), and Norm MacDonald (opens in new tab)—all of them dead—suddenly appearing as active Twitter Blue subscribers. It’s the sort of thing that would be tremendously embarrassing for anyone with a sense of shame; in Musk’s case, however, it had little visible effect aside from sparking a brief, entirely one-sided beef between him and dril, who spent the weekend changing his Twitter handle in order to dodge the blue check—which, in a fitting coda to this whole ridiculous ordeal, is why dril is currently named “slave to Woke.”
(opens in new tab)
